I've been silent for awhile now. I've wanted to write something but the flood of hype has been a veritable tsunami that has kept me from being able to narrow my focus enough to put together any cogent thoughts. As I pondered this, it dawned on me that this may well be the political class and the main stream media's plan. To keep things in so much turmoil that its near impossible to see the forest for the trees!
Let's take this past week.
My theory is that the Clintons and the MSM have known for some time that Wikileaks was holding some really damning evidence against her. So some lefty fellow traveler at Access Hollywood or what ever show it was that had the Trump video came to them with it months ago. A calculated decision was then made to hold this information until Wikileaks started to release their info. They would then release the Trump video, and with the complicity of the MSM, which Wikileaks has proven to be coordinating with the Clintons, they would gin up the social justice outrage so folks wouldn't notice the damning evidence coming out against Hillary.
If whoever had the Trump tape truly believed this was something that needed to be addressed, wouldn't they have brought this forth right after it was taped 11 years ago? I believe this just proves that Hollywood and the left saw Trumps comments as giving voice to the privilege that all famous (read that as famous liberal) people get to enjoy. Back then Donald was thought to be one of them, a famous star who would go to Clinton weddings, etc. so they didn't really have a reason to bring it up. But once he became a real threat to their anti sovereign America plans, he had to be stopped. So the question became, when can it best be deployed?
(Now in fairness, Wikileaks probably did some similar calculus with their information on the Clinton cabal. The difference as I see it is, I don't believe Assange is in cahoots with Trump or the republicans, but is motivated by a dislike of the Clintons and their RICO like behavior.)
They clearly decided to drop their bomb last Friday as Wikileaks began to release a series of devastating hacked emails showing that Hillary Clinton was guilty of malfeasance while Sec. State and complicity in acts that lead to the arming of ISIS to say nothing of the deaths in Benghazi. The leaks also show coordination of efforts between the Clinton campaign, the DNC and the MSM aimed at duping the electorate.
But what do we hear on the radio and see on the news? Why it's the media generated outrage about some offensive language by Trump 11 years ago. This outrage is being spun up by the same folks who were telling us it was not important where Bill Clinton chose to put his cigar in the Oval Office, and it was unimportant anyway because it was just sex and it was between Monica and Bill and none of our business because it didn't affect how he did his job as POTUS. Yet we are to believe words (and maybe some actions, we don't know) in an equivalent vein make this person unable to perform the same job. (This is also requiring us to overlook some amazingly similar behavior by the liberal lions JFK and RFK that the MSM was also in on the coverup of.)
All the while the MSM are telling us that Trumps support is tanking (which I'm sure it has taken a hit) as they fail to report that DT draws a Florida crowd of 30,000 while at the same basic time HC struggles to draw 1,000 in the same state.
I'm starting to wonder if we aren't approaching another "DEWEY DEFEATS TRUMAN" moment. For the sovereignty of the US, I certainly hope so, or we are about to become the Socialist States of Soros.
Or so it would seem to an old farm boy!
No comments:
Post a Comment